- Home Page
- Latest Updates
- Tumor Types
- Molecular Causes of Cancer
- Biological Pathways
- Therapeutic Targets
- Pipeline Molecules
- Research Education
- Research ADCs
- Research Apoptosis
- Research B cell
- Research BRAF
- Research HDIs
- Research Hedgehog
- Research HER Pathways
- Research VEGF
- Why is the VEGF ligand essential throughout tumor development?
- What are the strategies for inhibiting the VEGF pathway?
- What are the effects of direct VEGF ligand inhibition?
- Why is continued VEGF inhibition important?
- Why do tumors progress?
- The role of VEGF across tumor types
- Slide decks and videos
- Glossary
- Clinical Trials
- Resources
- Contact Us
Biooncology R-VEGF
Related Resources for this page:
- Clinical Trials
- Future Directions
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates
- A brief history of ADCs
- Current research in ADCs
- Cytotoxic agent
- HER Signaling
- High VEGF expression
- How are ADCs designed to work?
- Hypoxic tumor environment promotes angiogenesis
- Glossary
- MVD and progression
- Monoclonal antibody
- Regulation of VEGF expression
- Research ADCs
- Slide decks and videos
- Stable linker
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- Targeting cancers with ADCs
- VEGF and MVD
- VEGF in bladder cancer
- VEGF in gastric cancer
- VEGF in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and prognosis
- VEGF and prognosis in multiple myeloma
- VEGF and prognosis in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and progression
- VEGF and progression in urothelial carcinoma
- VEGF and tumor progression in gastric cancer
- VEGF and tumor progression in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF expression and liver metastases
- VEGF expression in gastric cancer
- VEGF expression in multiple myeloma
- VEGF in multiple myeloma
- VEGF pathways in multiple myeloma
- VEGF, MVD, and metastases in gastric carcinoma
- What are ADCs?
- Antibody-Drug conjugates
- Glycoengineered Antibodies
- HER Signaling
- High VEGF expression
- Hypoxic tumor environment promotes angiogenesis
- MVD and progression
- Regulation of VEGF expression
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- VEGF and MVD
- VEGF in bladder cancer
- VEGF in gastric cancer
- VEGF in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and prognosis
- VEGF and prognosis in multiple myeloma
- VEGF and prognosis in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and progression
- VEGF and progression in urothelial carcinoma
- VEGF and tumor progression in gastric cancer
- VEGF and tumor progression in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF expression and liver metastases
- VEGF expression in gastric cancer
- VEGF expression in multiple myeloma
- VEGF in multiple myeloma
- VEGF pathways in multiple myeloma
- VEGF, MVD, and metastases in gastric carcinoma
- Non-Antibody Biologics
- Apoptosis
- High VEGF expression
- Hypoxic tumor environment promotes angiogenesis
- MVD and progression
- Regulation of VEGF expression
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- What are the strategies for inhibiting the VEGF pathway?
- VEGF and MVD
- VEGF in bladder cancer
- VEGF in gastric cancer
- VEGF in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and prognosis
- VEGF and prognosis in multiple myeloma
- VEGF and prognosis in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and progression
- VEGF and progression in urothelial carcinoma
- VEGF and tumor progression in gastric cancer
- VEGF and tumor progression in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF expression and liver metastases
- VEGF expression in gastric cancer
- VEGF expression in multiple myeloma
- VEGF in multiple myeloma
- VEGF pathways in multiple myeloma
- VEGF, MVD, and metastases in gastric carcinoma
- Targeted Small Molecules
- Apoptosis
- Gastric Cancer
- High VEGF expression
- Hypoxic tumor environment promotes angiogenesis
- MVD and progression
- Regulation of VEGF expression
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- Slide decks and videos
- What are the strategies for inhibiting the VEGF pathway?
- VEGF and MVD
- VEGF in bladder cancer
- VEGF in gastric cancer
- VEGF in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and prognosis
- VEGF and prognosis in multiple myeloma
- VEGF and prognosis in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and progression
- VEGF and progression in urothelial carcinoma
- VEGF and tumor progression in gastric cancer
- VEGF and tumor progression in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF expression and liver metastases
- VEGF expression in gastric cancer
- VEGF expression in multiple myeloma
- VEGF in multiple myeloma
- VEGF pathways in multiple myeloma
- VEGF, MVD, and metastases in gastric carcinoma
- Traditional Monoclonal Antibodies
- Glossary
- Gastric Cancer
- HER Signaling
- High VEGF expression
- Hypoxic tumor environment promotes angiogenesis
- MVD and progression
- Regulation of VEGF expression
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- Summary
- Angiogenic Signaling
- Slide decks and videos
- What are the strategies for inhibiting the VEGF pathway?
- VEGF and MVD
- VEGF in bladder cancer
- VEGF in gastric cancer
- VEGF in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and prognosis
- VEGF and prognosis in multiple myeloma
- VEGF and prognosis in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF and progression
- VEGF and progression in urothelial carcinoma
- VEGF and tumor progression in gastric cancer
- VEGF and tumor progression in pancreatic cancer
- VEGF expression and liver metastases
- VEGF expression in gastric cancer
- VEGF expression in multiple myeloma
- VEGF in multiple myeloma
- VEGF pathways in multiple myeloma
- VEGF, MVD, and metastases in gastric carcinoma
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates
Serum VEGF as a clinical marker
Studies have shown that serum VEGF (sVEGF) levels in cancer patients are significantly higher than in control subjects. Karayiannakis et al evaluated the clinical usefulness of preoperative and postoperative sVEGF levels in 58 newly diagnosed gastric cancer patients, and 61 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Those with prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or blood transfusions were excluded. Median follow-up time was 11 months (range: 2 to 46 months).1 The association between serum levels and tissue VEGF expression was not evaluated in this study.1
In this study, preoperative sVEGF levels in gastric cancer patients were significantly higher than in controls (P<0.0001), significantly correlated with disease stage and increased as the disease stage increased (P=0.01), and were elevated in patients with distant metastases compared with those without metastatic disease (P=0.004).1
sVEGF levels were significantly reduced following surgical resection (P=0.0005)1
Significant differences in median sVEGF levels after radical tumor resection (ο) and following unresectable disease (). Statistically significant differences vs preoperative values are shown (*). Fifty-eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed gastric cancer were included in the analysis. Fifty cases belonged to primary gastric cancer whereas, in 8 cases, the tumor developed in the gastric remnant many years after initial resectional surgery. The study population consisted of 38 men and 20 women with a median age of 68 years. Control subjects included 61 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers.
Adapted from Karayiannakis AJ, Syringos KN, Polychronidis A, et al. Ann Surg. 2002;236:37-42.
Figure 1.
Elevated sVEGF levels were associated with reduced rate of survival (P<0.0001)1
Significantly lower survival rate in patients with elevated VEGF levels (>533 pg/mL) vs nonelevated VEGF levels (P<0.0001) (N=58). Fifty cases belonged to primary gastric cancer whereas, in 8 cases, the tumor developed in the gastric remnant many years after the initial resectional surgery. The study population comprised 38 men and 20 women with a median age of 68 years. Control subjects included 61 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers.1
This study also revealed a significant association between sVEGF levels preoperatively and overall survival. sVEGF levels were found to act as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in a multivariate analysis.1
As for the source of sVEGF, this study implicates the primary tumor in producing and releasing soluble VEGF fragments into serum. The authors suggest potential uses of sVEGF for evaluating surgery and monitoring tumor recurrence, which require further study.1
Adapted from Karayiannakis AJ, Syringos KN, Polychronidis A, et al. Ann Surg. 2002;236:37-42.
Figure 2.
Reference:
- 1.
- Karayiannakis AJ, Syrigos KN, Polychronidis A, et al. Ann Surg. 2002;236:37-42.