'
The related resources bookmark allows you to jump directly to other pages on the site that contain information directly related to the topics you're currently exploring.
- Home Page
- What's New?
- Tumor Types
- Molecular Causes of Cancer
- Biological Pathways
- Therapeutic Targets
- Pipeline Molecules
- Research Education
- Research ADCs
- Research Apoptosis
- Research B cell
- Research BRAF
- Research Cancer Immunotherapy
- Research HDIs
- Research HER Pathways
- Research MET
- Research VEGF
- Why is the VEGF ligand essential throughout tumor development?
- What are the strategies for inhibiting the VEGF pathway?
- What are the effects of direct VEGF ligand inhibition?
- Why is continued VEGF inhibition important?
- Why do tumors progress?
- The role of VEGF across tumor types
- Slide decks and videos
- Glossary
- Clinical Trials
- Resources
- Contact Us
Share
What are the effects of direct VEGF ligand inhibition?
Inhibition of new and recurrent tumor vessel growth
Direct targeting of the VEGF ligand may result in ongoing inhibition of both new and recurrent tumor vessel growth (Table 1). It has been proposed that these effects may help inhibit tumor growth and metastasis.1-3
Research also suggests that blockade of VEGF signaling may help inhibit tumor growth by preventing progenitor cells from initiating new vessel growth at both primary and metastatic sites.4
Regression of existing tumor vasculature
Based on preclinical and clinical models, it has also been proposed that direct VEGF inhibition may regress existing tumor vessels (Table 1). These reductions in microvascular density have been associated with a reduction in tumor volume and weight (Fig. 1).3,5-12
Table 1. Summary of proposed effects of direct VEGF inhibition1-8,13-15
| Tumor vessel inhibition | Tumor vessel regression |
|---|---|
|
|
Fig. 1. Microcomputed tomography image showing effect of direct VEGF inhibition in a preclinical model8
References:
- 1.
- Borgström P, Hillan KJ, Sriramarao P, Ferrara N. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4032-4039. PMID: 8752175
- 2.
- Borgström P, Bourdon MA, Hillan KJ, et al. Prostate. 1998;35:1-10. PMID: 9537593
- 3.
- Warren RS, Yuan H, Matli MR, et al. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:1789-1797. PMID: 7535799
- 4.
- Ellis LM, Hicklin DJ. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:579-591. PMID: 18596824
- 5.
- Lee CG, Heijn M, di Tomaso E, et al. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5565-5570. PMID: 11034104
- 6.
- Willett CG, Boucher Y, di Tomaso E, et al. Nat Med. 2004;10:145-147. PMID: 14745444
- 7.
- Yuan F, Chen Y, Dellian M, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14765-14770. PMID: 8962129
- 8.
- Data on file. Genentech, Inc.
- 9.
- Tong RT, Boucher Y, Kozin SV, et al. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3731-3736. PMID: 15172975
- 10.
- Tobelem G. Targ Oncol. 2007;2:153-164.
- 11.
- Dickson PV, Hamner JB, Sims TL, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:3942-3950. PMID: 17606728
- 12.
- Rowe DH, Huang J, Kayton ML, et al. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:30-32. PMID: 10646769
- 13.
- Jain RK. Nat Med. 2001;7:987-989. PMID: 11533692
- 14.
- Jain RK. Science. 2005;307:58-62. PMID: 15637262
- 15.
- Folkman J. In: DeVita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology. Vol 2. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:2865-2882.